My favorite photo from Thailand: a RBNS macaque in Lop Buri. |
If spiritual but not religious (SBNR) is the movement that lulls the
secular masses into a false sense of spiritual security, then religious but not
spiritual (RBNS) is the equivalent amongst regular church goers. Whether it is
the temple-going-returned-missionary whose apostasy you never saw coming, or
your Christian friend whose lifestyle betrays no evidence of their
born-again-and-go-to-church-every-Sunday faith, it is far too common for
comfort. These are ever-present reminders that outward religiosity does not
equate to actual spirituality.
Elder Donald L. Hallstrom spoke to the
risking trend of RBNS in the church in the April 2012 General Conference:
Some have come to think of activity in the Church as the ultimate goal.
Therein lies a danger. It is possible to be active in the Church and less
active in the gospel. Let me stress: activity in the Church is a highly
desirable goal; however, it is insufficient.
In Mormon circles, there is a great tendency to equate regular church
attendance with having it all together spiritually. Most of us are guilty of
going to lengths to cover our blemishes prior to showing up at sacrament
meeting. Like a good actor, we’re ‘in character’ for at least three hours every Sunday. Often,
we become so good at it that our audience starts to believe it.
In all honesty, I wouldn’t have it any other way. We need as much
practice as possible in being the person we would really like to be. But there
is a fine line between putting on our Sunday best (literally and figuratively)
and trying to appear to be someone we’re not.
I love the assessment of Fr. James Martin who speaks out against the perils of both RBNS and SBNR:
I love the assessment of Fr. James Martin who speaks out against the perils of both RBNS and SBNR:
Religion without spirituality becomes a dry list of dogmatic statements divorced from the life of the spirit. This is what Jesus warned against. Spirituality without religion can become a self-centered complacency divorced from the wisdom of a community.
RBNS is every bit as unproductive for the pious as SBNR is for the secular. In truth, outward religious behavior that is not mirrored by
internal spirituality is an "abomination" in God’s eyes. The Lord said “they draw
near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me (Joseph Smith
History 1:19).” For the purposes of this post, the Good News Translation of Isaiah 29:13 is very instructive (here for KJV):
The Lord said, “These people claim to worship me, but their words are
meaningless, and their hearts are somewhere else. Their religion is nothing but
human rules and traditions, which they have simply memorized. (GNT Isaiah 29:13)
The Lord is not interested in lip service, but "requireth the heart and a willing mind" (D&C 64:34). It is far easier to memorize the rules and customs
of a religious tradition and intermittently perform it's associated rites than it is to actually be spiritual—at least as
defined by God (Romans 8:5-8). To do so is the essence of being RBNS. The RBNS have "a form of godliness, but [deny] the power thereof" and spend their efforts "ever learning [but] never able to come to the knowledge of the truth" (2 Timothy 3:5, 7). In some cases it is a deliberate attempt to appear to be something we are not. In most cases, it is unintentional. Either way, it amounts to Christianity-Lite. Though it may taste great, it is less definitely less filling.
Elder Hallstrom went on to say: "we need the gospel and the Church. In fact, the purpose of the Church is to help us live the gospel." You can't have one with out the other.
Elder Hallstrom went on to say: "we need the gospel and the Church. In fact, the purpose of the Church is to help us live the gospel." You can't have one with out the other.
As always - thank you. Very well put, important thoughts for personal evaluation.
ReplyDeleteI like this post, and I totally agree. I remember that I had a conversation with someone who had said, You know, there is such a thing as being too spiritual. Her remark rubbed me the wrong way, but it was good in that it caused me to pause and think.
ReplyDeleteI came to realize that there is no such thing as being too spiritual - as in close to the Spirit, but this was not the same as being to "religious." It is good to make the distinction and evaluate our own spirituality vs. religiousness.
Anyway - thanks for the post!
Reminds me of the old saying: you can never be too rich or too thin [. . . or too spiritual]. Thanks for taking time to contribute.
ReplyDelete